One day on the job and I'm already plagiarizing. Opinionist is a feature on the wonderful
Gothamist, a blog I respect, but have no professional relationship, casual relationship or even imaginary relationship with at all. I don't know these guys, but "Jiminy Opinionist" just sounds so right.
Periodically, I'll post a review or even just a series of nonsensical thoughts--whatever I please--about something. A play, a restaurant, a television show or a brand new Milton Bradley board game (though I'm a total Parker Bro's fanboy).
Today Jiminy Opinionist tackles "Billy Elliot: The Musical."

My Take: It's hard to believe that it took this long (10 years) for this crowd pleasing, sentimental film to be translated to the Broadway stage. But this year, after making mo' pounds in the UK then da queen makes knights (for another shocker, see the real
mother england), Billy Elliot has finally come to America.
Great right? In these troubled times, with Obama's honeymoon over and the economy in the toilet, who doesn't want to pay $126.50 to see the upflifting story of a British boy who wants to learn ballet and go to art school rather than be a productive member of society and start a career in mining, a field that has no future and will probably kill him? Well, all sounds rosey, but it's not all rainbows and unicorns with this one.
I love British things. Ricky Gervais. Hilarious. BBC News. Informative and sometimes unintentionally hilarious. Fish and Chips. Delicious, but fattening. But Billy Elliot: The Musical, didn't quite do it for me. The usual problem with these things are that they're "too British." Like "Fawlty Towers," that old John Cleese British sitcom. Slapstick comedy in an old hotel with people who have funny accents? That's just too British. But since normal British things are good and too British things are bad, that brings me to this conclusion: Billy Elliot is not British enough!


The production, clocking in a quick THREE HOURS, feels long and drags on and on. I was constantly checking my watch, wondering why the number I was watching was even in the musical. There's a number where there are giant dancing dresses on stage during a dream sequence with Billy's cross dressing friend. Isn't the cross dressing friend wearing the dress enough?! Do you really need 15 foot dresses (literally) prancing across stage like some high budget peep show for giants? No. No you don't. And Billy Elliot doesn't either.
So the wait was for nothing. Well, that's not entirely true. Billy can certainly dance. Not much of a singer though--prepubescent voices don't fare too well when it comes to singing about poverty stricken coal mining towns, apparently.
Stay tuned for more Jiminy Opinionist!